Understanding political knowledge and behavior among isolated communities in Aceh Province

Authors

DOI:

10.62941/ijass.v2i1.145

Issue:

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): In Progress

Keywords:

Political knowledge index, political behavior, isolated communities
Received: 2025-06-01
Accepted:
Published: 2025-03-31

Research Article

Downloads

How to Cite

Maimun, Novitasari, Ahmady, I., & Putra, I. (2025). Understanding political knowledge and behavior among isolated communities in Aceh Province. International Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 2(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.62941/ijass.v2i1.145

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Abstract

Several surveys have successfully revealed the political knowledge index of the general population, but these studies are very limited. In fact, there has been no specific research in Indonesia that focuses on the political knowledge index of indigenous or tribal communities. This study aims to measure the political knowledge index and describe the political behavior of isolated communities in Aceh Province. The political knowledge variables used in this research include: (1) democracy, (2) power, (3) distribution and allocation, (4) decision-making, and (5) public policy. Meanwhile, the political behavior variables consist of radical behavior, moderate behavior, conservative behavior, traditional behavior (status quo), and liberal behavior. Based on its objectives, this research is classified as qualitative with an ethnographic approach. Data collection was conducted through surveys and in-depth interviews. The findings indicate that the community’s understanding of democracy, power, distribution and allocation, decision-making, and public policy is primarily associated with elections and political parties. As a result, their political participation occurs mainly during elections, and their voting decisions heavily depend on the mobilization efforts carried out by local actors such as village heads, sub-district chiefs, and district-level officials.

References

Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400874569

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2022). Statistik pendidikan politik dan kesadaran pemilih di wilayah terpinggirkan. Jakarta: BPS RI.

Biesta, G. J. (2015). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315635811

Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (2020). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics (2nd ed.). Harvard University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Button, M. E. (2018). Bounded rationality without bounded democracy: Nudges, democratic citizenship, and pathways for building civic capacity. Perspectives on politics, 16(4), 1034-1052. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718002086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718002086

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dalton, R. J. (2017). The participation gap: Social status and political inequality. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198733607.001.0001

Daviter, F. (2015). The political use of knowledge in the policy process. Policy Sciences, 48, 491-505. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11077-015-9232-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9232-y

Devine, C. J. (2015). Ideological social identity: Psychological attachment to ideological in-groups as a political phenomenon and a behavioral influence. Political Behavior, 37, 509-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9280-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9280-6

Early, A. S., Smith, E. L., & Neupert, S. D. (2023). Age, education, and political involvement differences in daily election-related stress. Current Psychology, 42(25), 21341-21350.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Farikiansyah, I. M., Salamah, M. N., Rokhimah, A. U., Ma'rifah, L., Faruq, F. N. F., & Al Gufron, M. A. (2024). Meningkatkan partisipasi pemilu melalui literasi politik pemuda milenial dalam pendidikan kewarganegaraan. Journal of Education Research, 5(4), 6512-6523. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.793

Forestal, J. (2022). Designing for democracy: How to build community in digital environments. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197568750.001.0001

Gee, J. P. (2018). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge.

Ginting, L. M. B., & Ivanna, J. (2024). Pengaruh Pendidikan Dalam Menentukan Pilihan Politik pada Pemilihan Umum Presiden 2024 di Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 8(1), 725-733. https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v8i1.6398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57235/arrumman.v1i2.4310

Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice (4th ed.). Routledge.

Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315146027

Harefa, D., & Fatolosa Hulu, M. M. (2020). Demokrasi Pancasila di era kemajemukan. Pm Publisher.

Indonesian Survey Institute. (2022). Laporan survei pemahaman politik masyarakat terpencil di Indonesia. Jakarta: Lembaga Survei Indonesia (LSI).

Khachatryan, R. (2016). Praxis of increasing public trust toward bureaucracies: in search of competitive practices of stakeholder engagement in higher education institutions ofarmenia. 21st Century, (1 (19)), 38-61.

Komisi Pemilihan Umum. (2022). Partisipasi pemilih dalam pemilu 2022: Laporan statistik nasional. Jakarta: KPU RI.

Kraft, M. E., & Furlong, S. R. (2020). Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives. Cq Press.

Landman, T. (2018). Democracy and human rights: Concepts, measures, and relationships. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i1.1186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i1.1186

Lee, S. H. (2018). Alternative information and digital citizenship: The rise of unconventional political participation in the Asian context of Internet use. Journal of International and Area Studies, 25(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.23071/jias.2018.25.1.71

MacIntyre, A. (2018). The power of institutions: Political architecture and governance. Cornell University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501731952

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks,. CA: Sage Publications.

Muttaqin, T. (2018). Determinants of unequal access to and quality of education in Indonesia. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 2(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2021.0132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v2i1.27

Nugraheni, A. Y. (2017). Pengaruh Pengetahuan Politik dan Aktor Politik Terhadap Partisipasi Politik Masyarakat Desa Trimurti Srandakan Bantul Pada Pilkada 2015. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan dan Hukum, 42-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v4i2p361-367

Nugraheni, A. Y. (2017). Pengaruh Pengetahuan Politik dan Aktor Politik Terhadap Partisipasi Politik Masyarakat Desa Trimurti Srandakan Bantul Pada Pilkada 2015. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan dan Hukum, 42-69 http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v4i2p361-367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um019v4i2p361-367

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Parvin, P. (2018). Democracy without participation: A new politics for a disengaged era. Res Publica, 24, 31-52. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11158-017-9382-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-017-9382-1

Pechar, E., Bernauer, T., & Mayer, F. (2018). Beyond political ideology: The impact of attitudes towards government and corporations on trust in science. Science Communication, 40(3), 291-313. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470187639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018763970

Penney, J. (2017). The citizen marketer: Promoting political opinion in the social media age. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190658052.003.0001

Perloff, R. M. (2021). The dynamics of political communication: Media and politics in a digital age. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429298851

Persson, M. (2015). Education and political participation. British Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 689-703. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000409

Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400820740

Riessman, C. K. (2020). Narrative methods for the human sciences (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2018). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Salmon, E., Chavez R, J. F., & Murphy, M. (2023). New perspectives and critical insights from Indigenous peoples’ research: A systematic review of Indigenous management and organization literature. Academy of Management Annals, 17(2), 439-491. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2021.0132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2021.0132

Sasaki, I., & Baba, S. (2024). Shades of cultural marginalization: Cultural survival and autonomy processes. Organization Theory, 5(1), 26317877231221552. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877231221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877231221552

Setiawan, A., & Purwanti, A. (2024). Keamanan Insani dan Politik Global. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Smith, L. (2015). Critical information literacy and political agency: A critical, phenomenographic and personal construct study of young people's experiences of political information. https://stax.strath.ac.uk/concern/theses/gf06g2728

Sonowal, C. J. (2024). Tribal Hinduism Contested An Autoethnography of Sonowal Kacharis of Assam. Anthropological Investigations in Contemporary India: A cross-cultural perspective, 114.

Swigart, K. L., Anantharaman, A., Williamson, J. A., & Grandey, A. A. (2020). Working while liberal/conservative: A review of political ideology in organizations. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1063-1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320909419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320909419

Thomassen, J., Andeweg, R., & Van Ham, C. (2017). Political trust and the decline of legitimacy debate: A theoretical and empirical investigation into their interrelationship. In Handbook on political trust (pp. 509-525). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545118.00041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545118.00041

Torney‐Purta, J., Cabrera, J. C., Roohr, K. C., Liu, O. L., & Rios, J. A. (2015). Assessing civic competency and engagement in higher education: Research background, frameworks, and directions for next‐generation assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2015(2), 1-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12081

Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barberá, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., ... & Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. Political polarization, and political disinformation: a review of the scientific literature (March 19, 2018). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3144139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139

Waddington, H., Sonnenfeld, A., Finetti, J., Gaarder, M., John, D., & Stevenson, J. (2019). Citizen engagement in public services in low‐and middle‐income countries: A mixed‐methods systematic review of participation, inclusion, transparency and accountability (PITA) initiatives. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(1-2), e1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1025

Weiss, J. (2020). What is youth political participation? Literature review on youth political participation and political attitudes. Frontiers in Political Science, 2, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2020.00001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2020.00001

Welch, S. (2016). The concept of political culture. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02979-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02979-2

Author Biographies

Maimun, Department of Governace Science, Faculty Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Novitasari, Department of Political Science, Faculty Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Iqbal Ahmady, Department of Political Science, Faculty Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Irwan Putra, Department of Pancasila and Civic Education, Faculty of Education, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Maimun, Novitasari, Iqbal Ahmady, Irwan Putra

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.